Ideally I would love to say that pacifism is the answer to all the worlds problems. I would love to say, that conflicts could be resolved without violence. But in some situations, pacifism may not be the answer. I believe the human race is still has a lot to learn and someday pacifistic ideals will be practiced by all. But for now I think we are still evolving towards non-violence. In cases where genocide and injustices are being committed to others, I think the only way to stop the perpetrators is to use “just” war. The people committing such terrible acts would not listen to reason. They are often consumed with hatred and revenge. A clear example would be the Nazi Regime. They wouldn’t have stopped slaughtering Jews and other so called “non-desirables” ,if no one would have stepped in. Situations like these are the only ones which I believe can be combated against with violence. I do wish that things could be settled with non-violence, but under some circumstances ,actions must be taken to liberate the victims of human right violations. I do, however, have issues with the just war theory. War should only be used under extreme circumstance such as the ones I stated. However, people may define just differently than others. People can also use “just” war as an excuse to wage war. For example, I’m not convinced that the war in Iraq is just. The citizens of the U.S. don’t even know why we are there. Could it be military fanaticism or to protect oil interests? I’m not sure. But as of now I don’t see anyone being liberated. All I’ve been hearing about is struggle and death.